Moving to Learn

Rewarding Students with Screens – Pros and cons for best practice in schools

Increased use of cell phones and tablets in schools has reached a point of no return, as evidenced by education government’s refusal to fund books. While parents like to think these devices are being used for educational purposes, quite often they are on social media or playing video games. Teens now log in an average of 9 hours per day of entertainment technologies at home, and then continue this mindless entertainment at school. Student gamers who arrive at school late, or not at all because of late night gaming, are generally unmotivated, sleep deprived, and attention deficit. Engaging these “gamer brains” has become a far-reaching and often desperate challenge for many teachers. Technology management policy in schools is either non-existent or grossly inconsistent between teachers, allowing students to do whatever they please with their devices. Defiance of authority is now endemic in schools, leaving teachers to increasingly barter school work for screen time. While using screens as a reward for work might provide ‘short term gain’, the ‘long term pain’ is dubious and can prove to be potentially harmful.

Dr. Andrew Doan M.D., PhD, a researcher on video game impact and author of “Hooked on Games” states “The research shows that digital media and video games are as potent as controlled narcotics in clinical medicine where we scrub burns off of burn-patients while they play video games. So therefore, are you comfortable with substituting digital media and video games with pot-laden brownies or crack-laden brownies to get your students to come to school?” A quick review of recent research and events will help teachers understand the cumulative effects of using screens as rewards in schools. A 2017 study of grade 8-12’s showed significant increased mental illness and suicide risk in teens with high screen usage, citing social media and gaming as causal factors. A 2010 meta-analysis of over 1000 studies showed video games increase incidence of aggression and oppositional defiance. In 2017 the World Health Organization designated “video game disorder” as a mental illness. Sleep deprivation was termed “epidemic” in children and youth in 2016, as was obesity and diabetes in 2015, both citing screen overuse as causal factors. In 2016 the National Toxicology Program completed preliminary studies showing cancer in rats exposed to wireless radiation. In 2017 France banned all cell phones from elementary and high school settings. As problematic behaviors and delays in child development soar, so does the number of students requiring support for learning difficulties. Education governments continued funding of support services for these students will quite literally ‘break the bank’, if it hasn’t already.

Understanding problematic student behavior and the rising incidence of defiance, poor motivation, attention deficit, and refusal to do work requires a systematic review of underlying causal factors; rewarding these behaviors with screens only confuses the issue. The following are just a few questions which might help teachers better understand underpinnings to behavior.

  1. What type of work are students refusing, all work or just specific academic tasks? Video games and social media immerse user in an artificial world which is easy and controllable. Reality is not.
  2. Is the bar just rightg. is the student’s academic skill level matched to realistic expectations? Heavy screen users usually struggle with work that is below perceived capacity to perform.
  3. When is refusal to do work worse, in the AM or PM? When does the student do their best work?
  4. What is the level of sleep deprivation of these students, and what is their attendance record; do they need a nap to perform better?
  5. What are the daily durations logged on screens by students, and what is the content they are watching? Heavy use gamers (> 3-4 hours per day) will be more defiant and possibly aggressive, so screen usage history is imperative when trying to comprehend refusal to do work.
  6. What is the fitness level of the student, and do they participate in any non-screen based activities, or are they usually sedentary? Each student should be able to identify 5 non-screen activities they do on a daily basis.
  7. Are students more compliant and motivated following movement or exercise? Many students are kept inside at recess when they would greatly benefit from outdoor exercise.

As we gain more information about why students are refusing to do work, we are better prepared to help them. Studies (and common sense) both indicate that using rewards rather than punitive measures can be an effective and efficient way to change behavior e.g. give them something, instead of taking something away. When considering what type of rewards are best practice, think about rewards that are valued by both student and teacher, for example extended recess or gym times, playing board games, or time spent in a leadership role with younger children e.g. recess or gym supervision, building an outdoor obstacle course. Rewarding students with screens not only lacks intrinsic value, it can prove harmful as evidenced by previously cited research. Students who refuse movement-based activities are common in today’s sedentary world resulting in poor fitness levels, lack of confidence in motor skills, and obesity. Consequently, teachers might consider identifying movement based activities that are within the skill set of students e.g. treadmills, elliptical, rowing machines, and then create conditions where the student wants to participate, without rewards. Use of devices which measure personal gains, as opposed to comparative measure with other students, help build intrinsic values e.g. step meters, heart monitors, loss of weight. Promoting intrinsic rewards that are healthy is always better than providing extrinsic reinforcers. Bottom line is rewarding a movement activity with sedentary reinforcers such as screens, is akin to pouring gas on a fire e.g. you’ve just negated the gains made with movement.

In summary, rewarding children with screens is never recommended, especially with students who are already overusing screens or showing signs of addiction e.g. preferring screens to healthy activities. It’s imperative for schools to first take a screen usage history including duration and content, as well as a sleep history. Second, try to determine the underlying causal factors for associated problematic behavior. Use this information to determine a behavior management plan that is reward based without use of screens. You can do this.

This article was written by Cris Rowan, pediatric occupational therapist and author of “Virtual Child – The terrifying truth about what technology is doing to children”. Cris works in school-based settings providing consultation and workshops on screen management to teachers and students. Cited research can be located at under Fact Sheet. Cris can be reached at

The views expressed in this article are those of Dr. Andrew Doan’s and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States Government.

Cris Rowen

Cris Rowan, BScOT, BScBi, SIPT

Cris Rowan is a biologist, pediatric occupational therapist and sensory specialist with expertise in the impact of technology on child development, behaviour and learning. Having worked in school settings for over 3 decades, Cris is committed to improving student health while also easing the job of learning for children. Cris is a well-known international speaker and author to teachers, parents and therapists globally on topics of sensory integration, learning, attention, fine motor skills and the impact of media content including video games, social media and pornography on children’s brain and body development. Cris has a BSc’s both in Occupational Therapy and in Biology, is a SIPT certified sensory specialist, and has Approved Provider Status for CEU provision with the American Occupational Therapy Association. Over the past 3 decades, Cris has provided over 350 keynotes and workshops, writes monthly articles for her blog Moving to Learn, publishes the monthly Child Development Series Newsletter, and is designer and creator of Reconnect Webinars which offer research evidenced information for teens, parents, teachers and clinicians to manage balanced between screens and healthy activities. Cris is member of the Screens in Schools committee with Fairplay for Kids, member of the Institute for Digital Media and Child Development and sits on the Board of Directors for the Global Alliance for Brain and Heart Health. Cris has two adult children, Matt and Katie who grew up without screens.

Cris can be reached at Reconnect Webinars offers a free, 5.5-hour CCAP accredited Screenbuster Program training webinar for teens which qualifies them to perform Tech Talks for their peers. The Screenbuster Program requires one counsellor, teacher or principal to complete the 3-day Balanced Technology Management certification CEU provided course in order to adequately supervise the teens.

Share This Article

Follow On Social Media

One Response

  1. The world is becoming digital now and schools are also part of this same world. However it is having some advantages and also some dark side as well. You have perfectly described the pros and cons of usage of internet in schools to reward students. Thank you for sharing this information.

Recent Articles

parent sos
Technology and Children

ParentsSOS (Parents for Safe Online Spaces)

Fairplay and David’s Legacy Foundation launched a new initiative called ParentsSOS (Parents for Safe Online Spaces). Our new ParentsSOS site features the stories of twenty families who have lost their children to social media harms.

Read More »